Mexico City, October 20, 2016 – Pursuant to article 50 section V sub‐section b) of the General Provisions Applicable to Security Issuers and Other Participants of the Securities Market (Disposiciones de Carácter General Aplicables a las Emisoras de Valores y a Otros Participantes del Mercado de Valores), OHL México, S.A.B. de C.V. (the “Company”) informs the public investor that on October 19th, 2016 its subsidiaries:
Concesionaria Mexiquense, S.A. de C.V. (“Conmex”), was notified, as third interested party (tercero interesado) and not as defendant, of an administrative proceeding brought by Tecnología Aplicada Infraiber, S.A. de C.V. (“Infraiber”) against the Ministry of Transportation of the State of Mexico (Secretaria de Comunicaciones del Estado de México or the “Ministry”) and the System of Highways, Airports, Associated and Auxiliary Services of the State of Mexico (Sistema de Autopistas, Aeropuertos, Servicios Conexos y Auxiliares del Estado de México or “SAASCAEM”), which is under review before the Seventh Regional Unit of the Local Administrative Court of the State of Mexico. By means of this proceeding, Infraber seeks to obtain a favorable resolution with respect to its arguments regarding the pending investment record to recover in Conmex.
Viaducto Bicentenario, S.A. de C.V. (‘Viaducto”), was notified as third interested party (tercero interesado) and not as defendant, of an administrative proceeding brought by Tecnología Aplicada Infraiber, S.A. de C.V. (“Infraiber”) against the Ministry of Infrastructure of the State of Mexico (Secretaria de Infraestructura del Estado de México or the “Ministry”) and the System of Highways, Airports, Associated and Auxiliary Services of the State of Mexico (Sistema de Autopistas, Aeropuertos, Servicios Conexos y Auxiliares del Estado de México or “SAASCAEM”), which is under review before the Seventh Regional Unit of the Local Administrative Court of the State of Mexico. By means of this proceeding, Infraber seeks to obtain a favorable resolution seeking to challenge the Agreement 01/2011, which concerns the amendment to Annex 4 and Annex 10 regarding to the concession title of the “Viaducto”.
Based on the opinion of its in‐house and external counsel, the Company considers that Infraber’s causes of action are without merit since there are no elements that justify its arguments.